How to Harden Client Communications: Countering Misinformation and Phishing in 2026
This guide provides practical steps to reduce misinformation exposure and phishing risk across client communications — an urgent priority for solicitors managing sensitive matters.
How to Harden Client Communications: Countering Misinformation and Phishing in 2026
Hook: In 2026 the greatest risk to client trust and confidentiality often starts in the inbox. Sophisticated misinformation networks and targeted phishing campaigns now target legal professionals and their clients.
The threat landscape
Recent investigations show coordinated networks that amplify doctored documents and manipulated media. Firms handling high-profile or litigated matters must assume adversarial actors will attempt to influence evidence chains or impersonate clients.
Read the comprehensive investigation for examples of how networks distort trust online (Inside the Misinformation Machine).
Immediate hardening steps
- Verified channels: Encourage clients to use a verified client portal or a firm-registered email address for sensitive materials. Avoid relying solely on unverified social DMs or consumer email for evidence transfer.
- Two-factor binding: Require hardware-backed 2FA for client portals and senior users. For asset-related cases, follow specific crypto hardening advice where relevant (How to Harden Your Crypto Wallet in 2026).
- Provenance logging: Capture and store metadata — who uploaded what, when and from which IP. This supports later chain-of-custody requirements.
- Phishing drills: Run simulated phishing campaigns and training; the objective is to reduce response times for suspicious messages.
Practical email policies
- Flag external addresses visibly in client-facing messages.
- Standardise subject prefixes for sensitive matters to make deviations obvious.
- Include guidance in turnover memos for clients on how to verify firm communications.
Dealing with misinformation in evidence
If you encounter manipulated images or network-amplified claims, document the discovery process and consider expert verification. The court and regulators now expect diligence on provenance; see the misinformation deep dive for investigative methods (Inside the Misinformation Machine).
Technology controls
- Signed documents: Use tamper-evident signatures and time-stamping for key exhibits.
- Immutable logs: Store ingestion logs in write-once locations.
- Endpoint protection: Harden devices and restrict admin rights on workstations.
Incident response playbook
Have a documented incident response plan for suspected misinformation or successful phishing involving clients:
- Isolate compromised accounts and preserve logs.
- Notify affected clients with clear remediation steps.
- Escalate to compliance and, where necessary, law enforcement.
Client education
Equip clients with a short, plain-English checklist for verifying firm messages and handling suspicious uploads. Encourage secure alternatives for large files rather than ad-hoc consumer services.
Where to read more
For firms looking to deepen their approach, these resources are helpful:
- Inside the Misinformation Machine — investigative context on how networks operate.
- How To Harden Your Crypto Wallet — relevant for clients with crypto assets.
- DocScan Cloud OCR review — for tamper-evident OCR capture and searchable exhibits.
- Serverless vs Containers — technical teams managing ingestion pipelines may find architectural guidance useful.
Final word
Hardened communications protect client trust. In 2026, a combination of simple controls — verified channels, provenance capture and ongoing training — dramatically reduces the chance of reputational or evidential harm.
Author: Marcus Reid — Security Editor & Solicitor. Focuses on information risk in legal practice.
Related Topics
Marcus Reid
Security Editor & Solicitor
Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.
Up Next
More stories handpicked for you